🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be cut by over 50%, after a controversial legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the future of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments could only establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building local support and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of electoral districts – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards suggested the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that chose to retain their seats.