🔗 Share this article

While the beleaguered Tories convenes in its conference city for its annual party conference, it has much to ponder regarding its path forward. It’s not even clear if a road forward remains open. These are challenging circumstances for a political party that now has very little, if anything, new or unique to say to the electorate.

An Alternate Reality

It could have been vastly better if tangible progress had been made on an priority that matters to people nationwide: Social mobility. Yet the previous administration hadn’t got the basic understanding on how to convert his zeitgeisty rhetoric on social mobility into concrete action. Over twenty-four months after the general election, it discussed what the concept truly represented.

I found it bizarre, because I’d already told the Prime Minister what levelling up signified when we initially discussed about it during his leadership campaign. This terminology was a concept I originated and used at the education ministry to talk about life chances. It was our departmental mantra, and its definition is unambiguous: social mobility is the means by which we realize fair chances – not through reducing prospects away from those who already have it, but rather by expanding opportunities to those that don’t.

The Core Concept

An additional vital DfE phrase we used, “potential is equally shared throughout the nation, but opportunity is not”, represented another a intentional wording, representing the dual components of a social mobility strategy. Initially, talent spread evenly but not nurtured uniformly through our schools and colleges. Additionally, access not provided uniformly by businesses or our economic system. Therefore, learning and employment were essential to achieving stronger social mobility. This was an mission about the social fabric of our country – supporting human talent and providing access to chances.

The Reality of Implementation

What did levelling up evolve into under the previous government? Regional development money overseen from the DLUHC. Street beautification and reconfigured roundabouts and roads. An official policy document was published almost thirty-six months after the leadership change, which saw existing policy approaches rebadged under the fresh social mobility slogan.

As a result, a wider fairness strategy went ignored, as well as all the improvement that it may have generated – in funding, enterprise, financial planning, taxation and in community development. And, of course, in learning, including a university system that has become a target for elected officials – despite the fact that it remains the primary vehicle of social mobility for young working-class people, including myself, this country has had over the past 30 years. Perhaps the only engine of social mobility, working extensively.

Why Hope Matters

Aspiration is crucial for our country to thrive. For people to have aspiration, there needs to be a believable feeling that hard work and results are connected; that if people aspire, they can succeed. For all administrations, being able to foster a sense of optimism about the years ahead is important. Analysis by the Institute for Policy Research at the academic establishment and others, published last month, showed that the DfE’s 12 “opportunity areas” I introduced as education secretary – community-focused methods to boosting academic achievement – led to youth in those communities being up to a significant margin more positive about their life ahead than those in similar areas without these initiatives in place. The research confirms: just making an authentic start on fair opportunity strategies can swiftly and beneficially change how people view their prospects.

Squandered Chances

Oblivious to this, and in the midst of its new leader election, in September 2022, the ruling party terminated the programmes. What reason would someone in those regions vote for a organization that did that? This specific initiative is a single instance of what might have become a game-changing Tory policy platform on social mobility, but that chance was completely wasted. Approaches such as this can inspire hope and aspiration. On the other hand, as the ruling party found out, failing to deliver of fair chances is the costliest mistake any political party can make. The public held accountable the administration for its incompetence but, perhaps most of all, for its unfulfilled commitments on social mobility.

The Current Landscape

Now the mandate on equal opportunity and fair access has been transferred to a opposition party. The old slogan has been cast off. The new government has its own policy language of “removing obstacles to success”. The political group that is increasingly displacing the failing Tories, Reform UK, also has its own terminology – “reindustrialisation”. It’s a phrase to talk about new opportunities in areas like the one I come from, in my hometown. It promises that an historical manufacturing base can revive into an industrial future.

For the public, it must appear as a repetitive cycle. Identical problem, different language. However, so far, no progress.

The Way Forward

Should the current and alternative parties want to escape the identical outcome, both these parties should understand the previous government’s errors on levelling up; that social mobility rhetoric is easy to say, but actual achievement of fairer outcomes is much harder. The UK’s persistently low life chances remains the key issue for our country, with the next generation unable to get a good job beginning, those laboring in employment with minimal progress after the rent has been paid, and individuals nationwide without any genuine belief their children will be able to do improve in life than they have.

Politicians can discuss improved access however much they like. Yet where is the organization that has the thorough strategy on life chances? I observe no such party. The first to achieve this, succeeds. Not only for their party, but, more importantly, for a complete society that has urgently needs equality of opportunity so urgently.