🔗 Share this article

Picture this: a happy the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Now, place it with a dejected the Slovenian forward in a Manchester United kit, looking as if he's missed an open goal. Don't bother finding an actual photo of him missing; context is the enemy. Then, include some goal stats in a large, silly font. Don't forget the emojis. Share it across all platforms.

Will you mention that Højlund's tally features strikes in the premier European competition while his counterpart does not compete in continental tournaments? Certainly not. And would you note that several of the Dane's goals came against Belarus and Greece, or that his national team is much stronger to Slovenia and generates many more chances. You run social media for a major brand, raw engagement is your livelihood, United are the biggest draw, and context is the thing to avoid.

So the cycle of online material spins. Your next task is to scan a lengthy podcast with Peter Schmeichel and find the part where he calls the acquisition of Sesko "strange". There's a bit, where Schmeichel qualifies his remarks by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, remove that part. No one wants that. Just ensure "strange" and "Sesko" are paired in the headline. People will be furious.

The Season of Promise and Hasty Opinions

The heart of fall has long been one of my favourite periods to observe football. Leaves fall, the wind turns, the teams and tactics are newly formed, everything is new and yet patterns are emerging. Key players of the season ahead are staking their claims. The transfer window is shut. Nobody is talking about the quadruple yet. Everyone are still in the game. At this precise point, all is possibility.

Yet, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has also been one of my least favourite times to read about football. Because although nothing has yet been settled, something must always be getting settled. The City winger is reborn. Florian Wirtz has been a crushing disappointment. Could Semenyo be the best player in the league at this moment? Please an answer immediately.

The Player as Patient Zero

In many ways, Sesko feels like the archetype in this context, a player caught between football's opposing, unavoidable forces. The imperative to withhold final conclusions, allowing layers of technical texture and tactical sophistication to develop. And the imperative to generate instant definitive judgment, a conveyor belt of takes and jokes, context-free criticisms and meaningless comparisons, a square that can not truly be circled.

It is not my aim to offer a in-depth evaluation of Sesko's time at Manchester United to date. The guy has been in the lineup four times in the top flight in a wildly inconsistent team, scored two goals, and taken a mere of 116 contacts with the ball. What exactly are we analysing? Nor do I propose to duplicate the pundits' notable debate "The Sesko Debate", in which two of England's leading pundits duel passionately on a popular show over whether Sesko needs ten strikes to be deemed successful this year (Neville), or whether it's really more like 12 or 13 (Wright).

A Harsh Reality

For all this I enjoyed watching Sesko at his former club: a powerful, screeching racing car of a striker, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his abilities: afforded the freedom to rampage but also the freedom to fail. Partly this is why United feels like the cruellest place he could possibly be at the moment: a place where "harsh judgments" are handed down in about the time it takes to watch a pre-roll ad, the club with the widest and most ruthless gap between the time and air he needs, and the time and air he is likely to receive.

There was a case of this over the international break, when a widely shared chart handily stated that the player had been deemed – decisively – the poorest acquisition of the recent market by a survey of 20 agents. Naturally, the press are not the only ones in this. Team social media, online personalities, anonymous X accounts with a oddly high number of fake followers: all parties with skin in the game is now basically aligned along the identical rules, an environment deliberately geared for provocation.

The Psychological Toll

Endless scrolling and tapping. What are we doing to us? Are we aware, on some level, what this infinite stream of irritation is doing to our brains? Separate from the essential weirdness of being a player in the middle of it all, knowing on a bizarre chain-reaction level that each aspect about them is now basically content, product, open-source property to be repackaged and traded.

And yes, in part this is because it's Manchester United, the corpse that continues to feed the narrative, a big club that must always be generating the big feelings. But also, in part this is a temporary malaise, a swing of judgment most visibly and cruelly observed at this time of year, about a month after the window has closed. Throughout the summer we have been coveting footballers, praising them, salivating over them. Now, just a few weeks in, a lot of those same players are now being disdained as failures. Is it time to be concerned about Jamie Gittens? Did Arsenal actually need their striker wise? What was the purpose of Randal Kolo Muani?

The Bigger Picture

It seems fitting that he meets their rivals on the weekend: a team at once on a long unbeaten run at their stadium in the Premier League and somehow in their own state of perceived turmoil, like submitting a a report on someone who went to the shops half an hour ago. Too open. Mohamed Salah finished. The striker waste of money. Arne Slot losing his hair.

Perhaps we have failed to understand the way the storyline of football has started to replace football itself, to inflect the way we view it, an whole competition reoriented around talking points and immediate responses, an activity that happens in the backdrop while we browse through our phones, unable to disconnect from the saline drip of takes and more takes. Perhaps this player taking the hit right now. However, everyone is losing a part of the experience here.